We value our network providers and work hard at being a good business partner. If and when disputes arise, we have processes in place to help resolve them. The nature of the dispute determines the specific resolution protocols.
Some matters are not subject to dispute resolution. Under standard network participation agreements, both Blue Cross® Blue Shield® of Arizona (BCBSAZ) and its network providers generally have certain rights to terminate without cause or not renew the agreement, for any number of business reasons. When BCBSAZ or a provider decides to timely exercise those rights, there are no dispute, grievance, or reconsideration rights available to either party.
1. Credentialing Disputes - resolution process
a. Terminations for professional competency, conduct or quality of care
Contracted providers may dispute BCBSAZ's decision to terminate a contract for lack of professional competence or for professional misconduct.
Examples of these disputes include, but are not limited to:
- Belief that a quality-of-care issues exists
- Adverse action taken by a hospital
- Disciplinary action taken by a licensing board
- Trend or pattern of quality-of-care issues
If a provider is terminated for professional competency or conduct:
- BCBSAZ will notify the provider in writing of the reason for the termination and of the provider’s reconsideration rights
- The provider may request reconsideration in writing (including relevant information) no later than 30 calendar days after receipt of notice of termination from BCBSAZ.
- A reconsideration panel consisting of at least three qualified individuals who did not participate in the original decision, with at least one participating provider who is a clinical peer of the requesting provider and who is not otherwise involved in BCBSAZ provider network management or other BCBSAZ committees, will review the reconsideration request at its next meeting (scheduled at least quarterly).
- The panel will notify the provider within 7 calendar days of its decision.
- If the provider is not satisfied with the panel's decision, the provider has 30 calendar days from the receipt of the decision to request a second-level reconsideration (with a personal appearance before a second panel).
- A second panel of three individuals who did not participate in the first-level decision, including at least one participating provider who is a clinical peer of the requesting provider and who is not otherwise involved in BCBSAZ provider network management or other BCBSAZ committees, will hold the second-level reconsideration hearing. The panel will be convened no later than 60 calendar days after BCBSAZ receives the provider’s request, unless an extension is necessary (for up to an additional 60 calendar days).
- The panel's decision is final and will be communicated to the provider in writing, via certified mail, within 7 calendar days of the decision.
b. Immediate suspension or termination related to concerns for member safety
If a BCBSAZ medical director believes a provider is practicing in a manner that poses a significant risk to the health, welfare, or safety of members, BCBSAZ can either immediately suspend or terminate the provider.
- If the circumstances require an investigation for BCBSAZ to know whether the concerns are justified, BCBSAZ will immediately suspend the provider contract and conduct an expedited investigation.
- If the circumstances do not require an investigation for BCBSAZ to know whether the concerns are justified, BCBSAZ will immediately terminate the provider contract.
- Examples of circumstances that might result in immediate suspension or termination include, but are not limited to:
- Insufficient or no professional liability insurance
- Sanction by Medicare/Medicaid
- Exclusion from any federal programs
- A change in license status which prohibits the provider from practicing or places limitations that materially limit the provider’s ability to provide a full range of medically necessary services to members
- Fraudulent activity
When a suspension or termination occurs:
- BCBSAZ will promptly remove the provider from the directory and send the provider written notice of the action and the reason for it.
- The provider has 30 calendar days from receipt of the notice to send BCBSAZ a written request for reconsideration if the triggering event allows for reconsideration rights (certain types of felony convictions cannot be appealed). The request should include relevant information.
If the provider is not satisfied with the panel's decision, the provider has 30 calendar days from receipt of the decision to request a second-level reconsideration (with a personal appearance before a second panel).
- A reconsideration panel will review the reconsideration request at its next meeting (scheduled at least quarterly). The panel will have at least three qualified individuals who did not participate in the original decision, with at least one participating provider who is a clinical peer of the requesting provider and who is not otherwise involved in BCBSAZ provider network management or other BCBSAZ committees.
- The panel will notify the provider of its decision within 7 calendar days after the meeting.
- A personal appearance panel will hold a second-level reconsideration hearing no later than 60 calendar days after BCBSAZ receipt of the request. The panel may extend the time period for up to an additional 60 calendar days, for good cause. (The panel will have three individuals, who did not participate in the first-level decision, including at least one participating provider who is a clinical peer of the requesting provider and who is not otherwise involved in BCBSAZ provider network management or other BCBSAZ committees).
- The panel's decision is final and will be communicated to the provider in writing, via certified mail, within 7 calendar days of the decision.
2. Administrative Disputes - resolution process
Administrative disputes are different from disputes related to professional competence or conduct, or quality of care. There are two types of administrative disputes:
- Provider contract breach, initiated when BCBSAZ notifies a provider that the provider is in breach of the network participation agreement or a policy incorporated in the agreement: and
- Provider grievance, initiated by a provider due to disagreement or dispute with BCBSAZ.
a. Provider contract breaches
A contract breach dispute can arise when a contracted provider wishes to protest BCBSAZ’s decision that the provider is in breach of obligations in the provider’s participation agreement or a BCBSAZ policy that is incorporated by reference in the provider’s agreement. Examples of provider contract breach disputes include, but are not limited to:
- Non-compliance with administrative terms in the network participation agreement or Provider Operating Guide
- Billing a member in violation of the member hold harmless provisions of the agreement
- Failure to timely submit requested medical records
- Referrals to providers and use of facilities outside the member's network when network providers and facilities are available
BCBSAZ will take appropriate action to address any breach of contract. If the provider does not cure the breach following notice from BCBSAZ, it may result in contract termination.
If BCBSAZ invokes the contractual right to terminate a provider’s contract, we will initiate the administrative dispute process as described below.
Contract breach dispute resolution process
- BCBSAZ will send a termination letter to notify the provider that the contract is terminated and provide information about the dispute resolution process and reconsideration rights.
- The provider may request reconsideration in writing (including relevant information) no later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the notice from BCBSAZ.
- After the provider’s reconsideration request is received, an authorized representative who was not involved in the initial decision on the subject of the dispute will review the written request for reconsideration and make a decision.
- The authorized representative's decision is final and will be communicated to the provider in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of the provider's written reconsideration request.
b. Provider grievances
The provider grievance dispute resolution process satisfies the Arizona state law (A.R.S. §§ 20-3101 and 20-3102) requirement that BCBSAZ establish an internal system for resolving payment disputes and other contractual grievances with healthcare providers. It is available to contracted and non-contracted providers.
Please note: Provider grievances arising out of services rendered to Federal Employee Program® (FEP®) members are not within the scope of the state law regarding provider grievances. However, FEP does afford providers an independent right to grieve as outlined here. FEP refers to the provider grievance process as provider “appeals” or “reconsiderations.”
When a provider disagrees with payment of a claim, or wishes to grieve a non-payment issue, the provider may initiate the provider grievance process (the "grievance process") by sending BCBSAZ a written request.
Grievance issues include but are not limited to:
- Whether a claim was clean
- Timely filing
- Failure to timely pay a claim
- Amount paid (bundling software)
- Amount paid (other than bundling software); Amount paid (other than bundling software)
- Amount or timeliness of interest payment
- Adjustment request
- Denials that require a provider write-off (for example: investigational/experimental)
- Network adequacy (other than the provider's contract status)
- Systemic or operational problems
- COB issues
- Sanction deductible
- Fee schedule disputes
- Outpatient global pricing
- DRG payment
- Fragmentation of incidental procedures
- Multiple medical/surgical procedure processing
- Mutually exclusive procedures
- Procedure unbundling
Note: Medicare Advantage (MA) claim payment disputes are handled through the MA claim reconsideration process. For more information, see the BCBSAZ Medicare Advantage Provider Operating Guide, Section 11 (in the secure provider portal under Provider Resources > Provider Operating Guide).
No claim corrections are permitted after a grievance is filed
Before submitting a grievance related to a claim, ensure that all information on the claim is accurate. A claim may not be corrected after a grievance has been filed. Grievance decisions are based on the premise that all information on the claim is accurate.
Provider grievance process: First-level review
All grievances must be in writing and submitted to BCBSAZ no later than one year after the denial or other notification, or date of the occurrence if the provider did not receive notification. BCBSAZ may extend this one-year time period for good cause or if a longer period is required by state or federal law. "Good cause," as used in here, means circumstances that were beyond the reasonable control of the provider and that prevented the provider from submitting a timely grievance request.
- The provider sends a first-level grievance request to BCBSAZ within the time frame explained above, including:
- A reference to, or copy of, the action with which the provider disagrees
- A written explanation of why the provider thinks the action is wrong, and the relief the provider is requesting
- All necessary documentation that supports the provider's position, such as medical records, operative reports, or office notes
- BCBSAZ employees who were not involved in the initial determination review the grievance, including any new information submitted to BCBSAZ.
- BCBSAZ sends the provider written notice of the grievance decision within 60 calendar days of receipt.
BCBSAZ may extend the 60-day time period for up to an additional 60 calendar days. If we require an extension, we will notify the provider in writing before the initial time period expires.
BCBSAZ will mail all decisions to the provider's last address on file, except for providers located outside of Arizona. We transmit decisions for out-of-state providers to the BCBS Plan in the provider's home state, and that BCBS Plan sends the decision to the provider. The decision is deemed received on the date of delivery, if hand delivered, or, if mailed, on the earlier of the actual date of receipt or five days after deposit in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid.
Provider grievance process: Second-level review
If the provider is dissatisfied with BCBSAZ's first-level grievance resolution, a second-level grievance may be requested. The second-level grievance must be submitted in writing to BCBSAZ within 60 calendar days after receipt of the first-level grievance determination. A provider may extend the 60-day time period for up to an additional 60 calendar days. If the provider requires this additional time to submit the second-level grievance, the provider must notify BCBSAZ in writing within the initial 60-day period.
- The provider sends the second-level grievance request to BCBSAZ within the time frame explained above, including:
BCBSAZ notifies the provider of the final decision within 60 calendar days after BCBSAZ receives the provider's second-level grievance request.
- A written explanation of the reason for dissatisfaction with the prior decision
- Any new supporting information for review
BCBSAZ may extend this 60-day time period for up to 30 calendar days on written notice to the provider, to be given within the 60-day period.
Send Provider Grievances and all necessary documentation to:
BCBSAZ Appeals and Grievances Department - Mailstop A116
P.O. Box 13466
Phoenix, AZ 85002-3466
Note: for grievances related to FEP claims or issues, use Mailstop B205
You may use the optional Provider Grievance Form [PDF].
Other information regarding provider grievances
Chiropractic services administered by American Specialty Health (ASH):
Chiropractic services are administered by ASH for most BCBSAZ plans (see exceptions below), including administration of the dispute resolution process. Please direct disputes to ASH at this address:
American Specialty Health (ASH)
Attn: Appeals Coordinator
P.O. Box 509001
San Diego, CA 92150-9001
Phone 1-800-972-4226 | Fax 1-877-248-2746
- For disputes regarding chiropractic services (and related claims) for members of custom large groups for which ASH is not the designated administrator, direct the
dispute to BCBSAZ.
- For disputes regarding chiropractic services (and related claims) for FEP members, direct the dispute to FEP.
- For disputes regarding chiropractic services (and related claims) for out-of-area BlueCard members, direct the dispute to BCBSAZ.
- For disputes regarding chiropractic services (and related claims) for CHS group members, direct the dispute to the third party administrator (TPA).
- CHS group member appeals or provider disputes
For CHS group members, direct all member appeals/grievances and provider grievances to the TPA at the address listed on the remittance advice. If the grievance is related to a specific pricing issue, the TPA will forward the grievance to BCBSAZ to review and determine if an adjustment needs to be made. If so, BCBSAZ will send the TPA a re-priced claim.